Options and Pre-emption Rights

Prospective purchasers and vendors of land frequently wish to ‘lock in’ the other party to the deal and the means by which this is done will normally involve the prospective vendor either giving the prospective purchaser an option to purchase the land or granting the right of pre-emption over its acquisition.

The two sorts of arrangement might seem at first glance to be the same, but there are significant differences between them.

Under an option to purchase agreement, the prospective purchaser is given the right to buy the land, possibly subject to the occurrence of a certain event or events, for a limited period of time. If the specified event occurs, the right to purchase is absolute.

A pre-emption agreement, however, gives the prospective purchaser the right to be ‘first in the queue’ should the landowner decide to sell the land within the pre-emption period.

Accordingly, an immediate right over the land is created under an option. An option will also bind a future owner of the land in question. A pre-emption agreement, however, does not create an immediate interest in the land. If the owner of the land decides not to fulfil the conditions which ‘trigger’ the pre-emption agreement, the holder of the pre-emption rights will never see them come into effect. However, pre-emption rights in regard to registered land take effect at the time of their creation and can therefore be binding on subsequent owners.

There are two other important differences between options and pre-emption agreements. To be binding, an option must be made in writing. This is because an option is a conditional contract for the sale of land and, under English law, contracts for the sale of land must be in writing. A pre-emption agreement need not be made in writing, although it is sensible to do so. In the case of a pre-emption agreement, the contract for land only comes into effect when the trigger event occurs and the holder of the pre-emption right then makes the offer for purchase, which the landowner is bound to accept. At that stage the contract must be put in writing.

The use of options and pre-emption agreements also create somewhat different tax positions and any negotiation of an option or pre-emption agreement should be carried out with the benefit of professional advice.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

UT Rejects Tenants' Appeal Against Costs Order UT Rejects Tenants' Appeal Against Costs Order
UT Overturns Finding That Company Was Managing HMO UT Overturns Finding That Company Was Managing HMO
FTT Rules Leaseholder Must Pay Service Charges FTT Rules Leaseholder Must Pay Service Charges
FTT Did Not Properly Explain Decision to Vary Improvement Notice FTT Did Not Properly Explain Decision to Vary Improvement Notice
Supermarket's Challenge to Rival's Planning Permission Fails Supermarket's Challenge to Rival's Planning Permission Fails
Property Developer Can Claim for 'Voluntary' Remedial Work Property Developer Can Claim for 'Voluntary' Remedial Work
Service Charge Reduction Set Aside on Appeal Service Charge Reduction Set Aside on Appeal
Company Denied Costs of Improvement Notice Appeal Company Denied Costs of Improvement Notice Appeal
Landlord Granted Dispensation from Consultation Requirements Landlord Granted Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
Appeal Against Penalty for Managing Unlicensed HMO Succeeds Appeal Against Penalty for Managing Unlicensed HMO Succeeds