Mixed Premises - Legal Status

Living ‘above the shop’ is quite common in the small business sector and where the premises are rented, the lease will cover both the business and residential parts of the property. However, the statutory basis for repossession is quite different for commercial and residential premises, especially where the latter qualify as ‘assured shorthold tenancies’.

Recently a landlord was seeking to repossess, on the grounds of arrears of rent, premises it had let to a fishmonger. The premises consisted of the shop on the ground floor, which together with a basement made up the commercial premises, and a first-floor flat in which the fishmonger lived.

The District Judge considered the tenancy to be a business tenancy, and therefore not protected by the provisions which apply to shorthold tenants under the Housing Act. A possession order in favour of the landlord was therefore granted. On appeal, the judge ruled that the initial decision had been wrong in regarding the lease as commercial when a residential tenancy had been created and set aside the possession order. The landlord appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA) will apply when the premises are occupied for business purposes, and a tenancy which is governed by the LTA cannot be an assured tenancy. The question therefore was whether the occupation of any part of the premises was for the purpose of a business carried on by the tenant. If so, the use of the residential part of the premises was incidental to the lease of the business premises and the tenancy could not be an assured shorthold tenancy.

The landlord won the appeal. The initial purpose of the fishmonger’s lease was to secure business premises, so the LTA applied.

Landlords who let mixed accommodation should be prepared for prospective tenants to demand separate leases for the commercial and residential parts of the premises.

In 2017, changes were made to planning regulations surrounding mixed-use hereditaments allowing some changes of use to no longer require formal planning approval.

 

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

Late Withdrawal of Right to Manage Objection Not Unreasonable Late Withdrawal of Right to Manage Objection Not Unreasonable
Landlords Had Reasonable Excuse for Failure to License HMO Landlords Had Reasonable Excuse for Failure to License HMO
UT Upholds Decision to Appoint Manager of Block of Flats UT Upholds Decision to Appoint Manager of Block of Flats
FTT Did Not Have Jurisdiction to Determine Rents FTT Did Not Have Jurisdiction to Determine Rents
Covenant Modified to Permit House's Use as Children's Care Home Covenant Modified to Permit House's Use as Children's Care Home
Landlord Successfully Appeals Against Rent Repayment Order Landlord Successfully Appeals Against Rent Repayment Order
Consultation Dispensation Granted for Urgent Works to Property Consultation Dispensation Granted for Urgent Works to Property
High Court Refuses Permission for Planning Decision Review High Court Refuses Permission for Planning Decision Review
Head Landlord Wins Appeal Against Rent Repayment Order Head Landlord Wins Appeal Against Rent Repayment Order
Landlord Served With Improvement Notice Wins Appeal Landlord Served With Improvement Notice Wins Appeal